<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu no longer likes to mount me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philroche.net/archives/ubuntu-no-longer-likes-to-mount-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philroche.net/archives/ubuntu-no-longer-likes-to-mount-me/</link>
	<description>All things Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.philroche.net/archives/ubuntu-no-longer-likes-to-mount-me/comment-page-1/#comment-46731</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philroche.net/archives/ubuntu-no-longer-likes-to-mount-me/#comment-46731</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure, but I think there was a change in the way ubuntu mounts drives around that time. I&#039;d check to see if fstab is even valid for the newer ubuntu&#039;s.

I don&#039;t recall having this problem myself, but I have vague half recollections of a change to do with mounting. Of course it may be nothing to do with this. Amusing title btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure, but I think there was a change in the way ubuntu mounts drives around that time. I&#8217;d check to see if fstab is even valid for the newer ubuntu&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall having this problem myself, but I have vague half recollections of a change to do with mounting. Of course it may be nothing to do with this. Amusing title btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
